close
close

Robotaxis escape California legislation that gives cities control over them

A group of companies backed by robotaxi companies is celebrating the failure of a California bill that would have allowed cities to regulate the controversial autonomous vehicles and fine them for violating traffic laws.

“The bill would have denied safety and accessibility to millions of Californians,” said the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, a group that represents self-driving taxi companies Waymo LLC and Cruise LLC, as well as Uber and UPS.

State Senator Dave Cortese withdrew his Senate Bill 915 on Monday after a legislative analysis for the Assembly Transportation Committee proposed changes that he said Tuesday would have gutted the local control provisions.

“The elected officials best positioned to enact appropriate security measures are at the local level,” Cortese said.

Critics had pointed out that a patchwork of local regulations would make it impossible for robotaxis to operate smoothly across borders and effectively serve public needs. The committee's analysis said the bill would create “unnecessary local control” over autonomous vehicles and potentially lead to “for-profit policing” in communities that use the vehicles as a source of revenue.

Cortese said an amendment to the bill that limited initial regulation of robotaxis to cities with 250,000 or more residents, with smaller neighboring cities allowed to adopt the ordinances, addressed concerns about fragmentation. The bill explicitly prohibited cities from banning the vehicles, and any mayor who tried to ban them in practice by drastically limiting their numbers would face overwhelming public opposition, he said.

The bill arose from a legal quirk that puts control over the deployment and operation of autonomous taxis in the hands of state authorities, while local governments have no say or ability to impose fines if the vehicles violate laws. This centralized control, along with a history of chaos caused by robotaxis deployed in San Francisco, has made some municipalities wary of the technology.

Under state law, the California Public Utilities Commission — which regulates personal transportation companies, including ride-sharing companies like Uber and Lyft, but not traditional taxis — and the Department of Motor Vehicles oversee the deployment and operation of robotaxis.

In March, the commission approved Google-owned Waymo's application to operate robotaxis on the peninsula – an expansion supported by the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, the Mountain View and Palo Alto chambers of commerce and some nonprofit advocacy groups, including disability and bicycling organizations. San Mateo County Executive David Canepa criticized the approval as “outrageous,” claiming it shows the commission and Waymo do not care about “the public safety of local residents.”

In San Francisco, state authorities allowed the introduction of robotaxis despite opposition from the city government. General Motors Co.'s Cruise vehicles, blamed for most of the subsequent robotaxi problems in San Francisco, were grounded by the DMV in October because the agency called them an “unacceptable risk to the public.”

Last month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an investigation into 22 crashes involving Waymo robotaxis in Arizona, including reports of “collisions with stationary and semi-stationary objects such as gates and chains, collisions with parked vehicles, and instances in which the (cars) appeared to disregard traffic safety control devices.”

Waymo said in a statement on Tuesday that the company conducts more than 50,000 trips a week “in some of the most demanding and complex environments” and will continue to work with the highway safety agency.

The company said opposing Cortese's bill “preserves the opportunity for Californians to continue to enjoy the benefits of autonomous vehicles.” Waymo said it would work with regulators and policymakers to expand its service “safely and prudently.”

Cortese believes the proliferation of robotaxis will lead to tragedies and fuel public anger over the vehicles getting in people's way. He would reintroduce the bill or support another lawmaker who has done so, he said.

“The community must be safe,” Cortese said.

Anna Harden

Learn More →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *